Copycat IED attacks – 100 years apart

One of the reasons I study historical IED attacks is the parallels with current IED attacks. Sometimes the parallels need a bit of analysis to see; sometimes the parallels are frankly startling.  He’s some specific UK examples.  It is often forgotten that the Irish terrorists have been planting IEDs in England since the late 19th century.  There were then subsequent campaigns in 1939 (the “S Plan”) and later in the 20th century. It is interesting that sometimes the exact same targets were attacked.

The IRA’s “S Plan” in particular, although largely unsuccessful, posed an intriguing terrorist threat worthy of study because the IRA in the early months of 1939 attacked the national electrical power supply infrastructure in the UK. Not with much success, I admit, but nonetheless with clear strategic intent.  There are a few other terrorist campaigns where specific aspects of infrastructure have been targeted but this is an interesting one. Details of the quite broad ranging S Plan attacks are here.

Below is a list of attacks that match or replicate IED attacks from earlier campaigns. In particular I would highlight the repeat attacks on Victoria Station (three times), and Hammersmith Bridge

Prisons:

1. 1867 – A “fenian” device used to breach a prison wall at Clerkenwell

2. 1939 IRA device blew up against the wall of Walton Gaol in Liverpool

London Train/ Tube stations

1. 1883/1884/1885 IEDs exploded at Gower St Station (now Euston Square) and Victoria Station left luggage office. Device defused at Charing Cross Station. Other devices exploded in tunnels

2. In 1939/1940 Devices exploded at Tottenham Court Road, Leicester Square, Kings Cross and Victoria Station left luggage office then in 1940 Euston station. IRA two devices defused at Baker Street

3. 1991, 1992 IEDs at Paddington station, Hammersmith and Victoria Station, London Bridge station, other devices on trains and near stations

Hammersmith Bridge

1. March 1939 Hammersmith Bridge attacked with two IEDs

2. June 2000 Hammersmith Bridge attacked with one IED

Houses of Parliament

1. 1884 Fenian devices exploded in the Houses of Parliament

2. 1974 IRA device exploded at the Houses of Parliament

Department stores

1. 1939 department stores attacked with incendiaries

2. 1991/1992 department stores and shops attacked with inendiaries

Scotland Yard

1. In 1884 a device exploded next to Scotland Yard, headquarters of the Metropolitan Police

2. In 1973, Police defused a bomb outside New Scotland Yard

Tower of London

1. 1885 An explosion at the Tower of London

2. 1974  An explosion at the Tower of London

Gasworks

1. 1883  A gas works was attacked with an IED in Glasgow

2. In 1939 gasworks were on the intended strategy of the IRA’s S Plan

3. In 1993 A gas works was attacked in Warrington

Complex IED attack circa 1584

At readers’ request, another example of an IED attack from the 1500s. I showed this to then Col Joe Votel when he set up the IED TF (the predecessor to JIEDDO) a few years ago.  This image below shows a complex IED attack from the early 1580s, I believe from the Spanish war against the Dutch rebels. Here we have a foreign Army  (the Spaniards) invading a country and the locals (with a different religion) objecting. The locals (the Dutch) have secret help from a neighbouring country (England) with similar religious beliefs who also regard the Spaniards as enemies, but don’t yet want to engage directly, so they provided explosive expertise to the local rebels.  (Get my drift?)

The image is clearer in its original form but this is the best I can do on this blog page. This is a complex IED attack of three command initiated IEDs against a military convoy.  The attacks is well planned and carefully constructed with IEDs functioning at the front of the convoy  (upper right), rear (upper left) and centre.  Note that the firing point for all three is across the river preventing the convoy’s soldiers from counterattacking. The enemy convoy are marching on foot from left to right.

From reading the WIT report on CIDNE (!) I can see that each IED consisted of a barrel of gunpowder buried under the road. In each barrel is embedded a wheel-lock mechanism, triggered by the terrorist across the river pulling a string.  You can see the string in the image if you look carefully.

The effect of the explosions is interesting, if you look carefully. There is a large explosion in each case and rocks and soldiers are thrown in the air and the river, with smoke billowing from each location.  Only two of the “terrorists” at the firing points are pictured, one on the left hand edge half way up, the other on the bottom right corner. (the third is out of the picture to the right). Each firing point is concealed in bushes with a good view of the road, and safe from counter-attack.

There are then cannons set up to subsequently engage the survivors, four in total.  So a good example of a complex attack on a convoy/foot patrol.  Despite the primitive technology I venture to suggest not much has changed and indeed the technology in theaters at the moment isn’t all that much further forward.

Comments welcome.

Hellburner Hoop

Readers of the blog will know I’m researching 16th century IEDs. This one is worth a blog.

The development of explosive devices required a number of technological developments. In the 14th and 15th century the manufacture of saltpeter (Potassium nitrate) became industrialized allowing the production of volumes of blackpowder.  (I’m simplifying things here for the short space appropriate in a blog).  Then with the invention of the Wheelock for firearms in the early part of the 16th century, this allowed for command initiation, by pull by using the initiation system for a gun in an explosive charge. There are a few red herrings around with regard to the use of Iron Pyrites and flint, which in a flintlock in the early 1600s became the favored option once stronger steel was made that wouldn’t be eroded by the flint – pyrites being the spark provider when earlier, softer steel was used in firearms. But of course in an explosive device the “lock” is only going to be used once, so I suspect flint initiation in a Wheelock mechanism, was the first use in IEDs in the 1500s.

The other engineering development in the 16th century that is pertinent is the clock.  Clocks became more widespread, as a cultural phenomenon and as technology permitted smaller clocks (I’m simplifying a chapter of my book here, into two sentences).  The first clock-initiated IEDs occurred in the 16th century. I can’t tell you exactly when the first one was, but I provide below the details of the incident that is the earliest incident where I can find details of such a device.  It is significant too, because I think it may be the IED that caused the greatest number of fatalities, ever, with possibly as many as 1000 killed. Possibly, too, the biggest ever IED. Possibly, too, the first ever WMD.  It also has a significant impact on a whole war in terms of the terror it gave, I believe too on the eventual defeat of The Spanish Armada, some years later, when they scattered before the British fleet, at least partly in fear of a similar device.

In 1584 the city of Antwerp was under siege and blockaded by the Spanish Army following a rebellion. An Italian Engineer, in the secret pay of the English, was supporting the Dutch rebels. In order to destroy a huge pontoon bridge the Spanish had constructed, he was given two Seventy ton ships, the Fortuyn and the Hoop. (“Fortune” and Hope”).

The concept of fire ships was already known and had been used already by the Dutch. But Giambelli, the Italian had bigger ideas. He constructed two massive IEDs, one in each ship. And when I say massive, I mean massive.  He was helped by two key individuals, Bory, a clock maker from Antwerp and Timmerman, a “mechanic”. Here’s a description of how each was made from a source document I found recently:

In the hold of each vessel, along the whole length, was laid down a solid flooring of brick and mortar, one foot thick and five feet wide.  Upon this was built a chamber of marble mason-work, forty feet long, three and a half feet broad, as many high, and with side-walks five feet in thickness. This was the crater.  It was filled with seven thousand pounds of gunpowder, of a kind superior to anything known, and prepared  by Giambelli himself. It was covered with a roof, six feet in thickness, formed of blue tombstones, placed edgewise. (Note: some sources say also this was sealed with lead)  Over this crater, rose a hollow cone, or pyramid, made of heavy marble slabs, and filled with mill-stones, cannon balls, blocks of marble, chain-shot, iron hooks, plough-coulters, and every dangerous missile that could be imagined.  The spaces between the mine and the sides of each ship were likewise filled with paving stones, iron-bound stakes, harpoons, and other projectiles.  The whole fabric was then covered by a smooth light flooring of planks and brick-work, upon which was a pile of wood: This was to be lighted at the proper time, in order that the two vessels might present the appearance of simple fire-ships, intended only to excite a conflagration of the bridge.

The initiation system for the Fortuyn was a slow burning fuse, while the Hoop, courtesy of Mr Bory the clockmaker, was initiated with an adapted clock. I’m guessing the striker of the clock was a modification of a firearm lock, wheel-lock or flintlock. One source suggests that the time delay was one hour. These ships were sent down the waterway with skeleton crews, along with 32 “normal” fireships, with the crews as usual setting them alight before getting away in small boats, allowing the currents, tides and winds to carry them towards the pontoon bridge.

The Fortuyn failed to be carried towards the best target and then when the charge exploded, it only partially functioned, causing no damage and no injuries. The entire Spanish Army, called to the alert on the approach of the fire ships, to fend them off and extinguish the fires, was heard jeering.  But the Hoop bore down on its target and became entangled with Spanish ships and the bridge itself. As soldiers boarded her to extinguish the fire on her deck, the clock ticked, … then struck.  7,000 pounds of blackpowder, reputedly the best Antwerp possessed, exploded and the pontoon bridge, many ships and hundreds of soldiers disappeared. Some sources say 800 Spanish soldiers were killed at that instant, others put the figure at 1000. Many remarkable tales exist about oddities of the explosive effect. (Detail will follow in the book!) Two of the Spanish generals bodies were found some time later, their bodies thrown considerable distances.

Although the Antwerp rebels were unable to exploit the effect of the explosion, probably because they too were simply shocked by its effect, the incident achieved immediate notoriety across Europe and great interest from military experts who recognized this as a new type of warfare.

Three years later when the Spanish Armada came to invade England, the use of fireships caused panic among the Spanish fleet, because of concerns that they could be loaded with explosives.. and by then they knew that Giambelli was overtly in England, working for the Queen. The Spanish Fleet was seriously disrupted and control of it was never regained by its admirals. And as a result, my Spanish language skills are limited today to ordering “Dos cervezas, por favor”  I have grossly simplified a complex action here, but hopefully blog readers will appreciate the unusual construct of the IED on the Fortuyn and the Hoop, and see the significance of the initiation mechanism.   In another aside and related to the last post about the assassination of generals….When the Prince of Parma, the Spanish General did ride into Antwerp, some months later, a conqueror, there had been a plot to kill him and everybody near him by blowing up a street over which it was calculated he would be sure to pass. Nothing came of this, because the plot was revealed before the procession occurred.

One final thought…. The Hoop attack concept was used again… in 1809 when British Admiral Cochrane attacked the French in the Basque Roads attack, and again in 1942, when the bomb ship HMS Campbelltown rammed the gates of the drydock in the St Nazaire raid as part of “Operation Chariot”.

The media and terrorist bomb making

There’s an interesting NPR article here about how the media report bomb making details.  The general thrust is that the genie is already out of the bottle and if a terrorist wants to make a bomb he doesn’t require education or prompting from press reporting to be able to make the final step.  As readers of this blog will know I don’t hold the press in high regard anyway for reporting useful facts in this domain!  (Note the comment from the CNN expert who clearly doesn’t know the difference between a fuel component in an explosive and an “accelerant” component in an incendiary.)   In general I would hope the point that making the public more aware of precursors is working – several recent cases have been reported to the police to start with by retailers of fertiliser or Hydrogen Peroxide who were suspicious of people buying the material from them.

Despite that I’m still a little amazed that in incidents such as the Glasgow airport incident and the Times Square effort that well educated terrorists mounted an attack with large devices that were never going to “detonate” in a million years. Wishful thinking gets you a long way but not far enough. It indicates strongly that these were lone wolf attacks without the training and  resources of an effective terrorist organisation behind them… which is good.  There is another argument though… from a terrorist’s perspective both attacks “succeeded” in terms of raising awareness of their cause…..Discusss…

Old and bold

I came across this while researching… in a German manuscript dated 1572. I think it’s the earliest EOD tool I have come across.  Nearly as old as some of the readers of this blog.

 

 

Close Me
Looking for Something?
Search:
Post Categories: