The Yildiz VBIED, 1905

I’m often asked about the history of vehicle borne improvised explosive devices, or car bombs. The book “Buda’s Wagon” posits that the first terrorist bomb of this kind was the explosion in Wall Street in 1920.   But as I pointed out here, this tactic is somewhat older with the attack on Napoleon in 1800 being a classic example.

Another pre-1920 VBIED that isn’t well known was the so-called “Yildiz” assassination attack on July 21, 1905.  This was an attempt by an Armenian revolutionary organization against the head of the Ottoman head of state, Abdul Hamid II, at the Yildiz Mosque in Constantinople (now Istanbul).

By 1905 Armenian left-wing revolutionaries had been fighting a long campaign against the Ottoman empire.  An interesting example of previous Armenian revolutionary attacks was the 1896 Ottoman bank take-over, when Armenian revolutionaries seized the Ottoman bank headquarters in Constantinople and held its mainly western staff hostage with a mixture of pistols, grenades and IEDs. IEDs allegedly recovered from the 1896 Ottoman Bank take-over They did this in order to publicise their campaign internationally. This attack has interesting parallels with modern “Fedayeen” tactics such as the Mumbai attacks of…. Indeed the Armenian revolutionaries even referred to themselves as “fedayees”.

Armenian Revolutionaries

In 1905 the plan was to create a large IED, and a founder of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Christaphor Mikaelian started making explosives in Sofia, Bulgaria. During this process, Mikaelian and a comrade Kendirian were killed in an accidental explosion.  Despite this, the plan for the operation continued.

 The attack once again took advantage of a predictable pattern of behaviour by the target. Sultan Abdul Hamid II attended the Yidliz mosque every Friday as a matter of routine. The Armenian revolutionaries studied his movements carefully, and decided that a large device, set on a timer, hidden in a carriage outside the mosque had a good chance of succeeding.

It’s interesting that the timer, to be set by the carriage driver, was a clockwork timer of only 42 seconds, giving, in theory, just enough time for the carriage driver to leave the scene. The carriage driver, a revolutionary called Zareh, was a veteran of the Ottoman Bank take-over from 9 years earlier.

Due to an unforeseen delay the Sultan escaped injury but 26 people died, including the carriage driver Zareh.

 

The design of the IED in the carriage was interesting.  The device was placed in a metal chest, and included 120kg of home made explosives.  Other reports suggest 80kg of explosives and 20kg of iron pieces as shrapnel.  I’m going to guess that the explosive used was nitroglycerine based.  Beyond that details of the IED and the attack are pretty scarce, and what can be found is confused by conflicting Armenian and Turkish claims.

Hezbollah threat – vbied?

I see things stirring in Thailand where US authorities have warned of an imminent terrorist attack. It appears this may be Hezbollah linked. Is this evolving threat an Iranian response to recent events, like the recent nuclear physicist assassination? Rather than close the Hormuz straits will they use a Hezbollah proxy to hit back at the west? Operational deniability, but strategic and political effect. It’s unlikely to be just Thailand. If it happens their MO would be a vbied. Hold on to your hats.

History Repeating Itself

The post below on historical IEDs clearly was of interest…thanks for all the comments on and offline. So I’ll plan to update an interesting historical example every week or so, where possible drawing a link to modern IED attacks…. I’ve got a fair library of these, from all over the world including a surprising number in the USA. In amongst my usual posts of course. As ever, comments, additions, arguments, points of fact etc are welcome.

So, not related to anything particular at the moment, here’s a comparison of two VBIED attacks, one in history, one in the modern era. (some of you will have seen this example before in my gigs). This comparison works well with some “story telling”, so forgive me its structure which is based on a verbal presentation and hence in a narrative mode.

In 1800, Napoleon was ruler of France. A short stockily built Artillery officer (aren’t they all?) and the son of a diplomat, he had seized power in a military coup some years earlier. On Christmas Eve he and his wife, the lovely Josephine, were off to the theatre to see an opera. They were running late, as Josephine “powdered her nose”. Grumpily because he was late he and Josephine got into their carriage, and he shouted to the carriage driver to drive fast, make haste. His route and his attendance at the event was predictable. On the route, on the Rue St Nicaise in Paris, a cart full of barrels of gunpowder (a VBIED ) had been left, with a terrorist set to light the fuse on it when the Emperor’s carriage turned into the street, with the fuze length set to explode the VBIED as the emperors carriage passed by, escorted by bodyguards on horseback.

However, the speed of the carriage, running late, meant it passed the VBIED and had turned the corner, before it exploded.

As a result of the explosion, numerous bystanders were killed along with two of Napoleon’s escorts, according to some reports. He survived but the window of his carriage was broken in the blast. There’s quite an interesting back story about various culprits, and the ensuing investigation, but I have no space here to go into detail. I’ve only sketched the detail here

So, wind the clock forward to Christmas Day, 2002, 202 years and one day later. President Musharraf is ruler of Pakistan. A short, stockily built Artillery officer (aren’t they all?) and the son of a diplomat, he had seized power in a military coup some few years earlier. He sets off in his vehicle convoy on a predictable route, with an armed escort, through the Garrison town of Rawalpindi. Along the route, two suicide terrorists driving pick-up trucks (the modern equivalent of a cart, surely?) attacked the convoy, front and rear. Musharraf escaped but two of his escort were killed and the window of his Mercedes is broken…

 

And the moral of the story….? Never trust an artillery officer….they are short and fat and tend to seize power in a military coup…

(next week…. A clockwork timed IED that killed 800 people in 1585… constructed in the most remarkable way. I kid you not.)

Close Me
Looking for Something?
Search:
Post Categories: