Some earlier posts discussed the home made explosives and IEDs manufactured by Irish republicans shortly after WW1 (around 1920), and I’ve returned to the trove of information I have discovered on this subject. One of the themes of this blog has become the way in which today’s counter-terrorist operatives can learn lessons from the past, and this is a particularly good example. During the 1980s one of a number of explosive devices designed by the Provisional IRA was a “drogue bomb”. This basically consisted of a tin full of explosives, with a striker fuze behind it, and it was lobbed at vehicles with plastic strips trailing behind it to ensure it hit the target nose first so activating the striker by momentum. To the EOD operator this was simple but “new” device.
What is interesting is that it wasn’t new at all. In about 1920 the IRA had previously developed what they called then a “drogue bomb”, and the diagram is shown below. For obvious reasons I’ve left off some of the technical detail – if you are an appropriately accredited EOD operator contact me and I’ll give you the full diagram. There are of course some differences between this 1920 design and the one from 60 years later in the 1980s… the striker mechanism has switched from the front to the back, and the steel case in the earlier device is thicker. Those of you knowledgeable of other IRA mortars from the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s will also recognise certain aspects of the fusing from this earlier device. I can tell you that EOD operators of my generation had no knowledge of the history of Irish republican device design from earlier campaigns. More fool us. As I’ve shown in earlier blog posts, improvised munition design used by Irish republicans goes back not only to this post-Easter Rising period, but to much earlier back to almost 1800. Previous blogs to have highlighted the similarity between an IRA mortar of this 1920 period and the British Stokes Mortar of WW1.
Of course there are similarities to this device and Russian grenades, and I believe also to WW1 German trench grenades which I suspect this device is derived from.
I’ve been doing more research on the IEDs used by the Irish “volunteers” between 1919 and 1922 and found some interesting aspects. One should remember the time-line of Irish Republicanism that these events of 1919-1922 sit on – Irish revolutionaries were using explosive devices much earlier, certainly as early as 1803, IEDs were used extensively by the Fenians in the latter half of the 19th century, again in 1939 and of course from 1970 onwards. The window of 1919-122 is just one point on the time line, but is worthy of study for all that.
Firstly, explosives, and I apologise for being somewhat circumspect in the detail here – no need to give modern day revolutionaries with other causes the full recipes. EOD folk can approach me directly of course and I’ll point you in the right direction if I know you. At the beginning of the campaign the explosives used was gelignite stolen from quarries, along with “No 6” detonators. This supply began to become more difficult to obtain and so the Irish volunteers identified chemists and pharmacists and those with military experience from WW1 to develop home made explosives (HME). There were three types, each given a nickname. I won’t describe their manufacturing process:
“Warflour”: Warflour was a nitrated resin, using the ingredients of resin, flour, acid and potassium chlorate.
“Irish Cheddar”: This was the nickname for a form of cheddite, an explosive used quite extensively in the early 20th century, its ingredients being potassium chlorate, nitrobenzene and castor oil. Some sources suggest that “Cheddar” included home made DNT. As an aside, this HME was used extensively by the Polish underground in WW2 in their IEDs, which I’ll write about in a future blog post.
“Paxo”. This was a mix of potassium chlorate and paraffin wax. It was the favoured HME in the 1939 campaign but was developed during this period.
The IRA also developed its own detonators at the time, and I won’t describe them here other than to say that interestingly they were non-metallic and quite an effective design.
In terms of IEDs, and further to my earlier post, the IRA of the time made several thousand grenades, mostly under the Dublin Bicycle shop at 198 Parnell St and latterly at other facilities. It appears that the design of these were copied from the German “Egg” grenade of WW1. These were essentially quite a simple design,small and preferred because they were easier to conceal than a larger grenade. They used the standard sort of fuze with a spring-loaded fly-off lever. Occasionally larger improvised grenades were used – this is a diagram of one of them, made by an IRA engineer involved in their manufacture.
IEDs used for roadside ambushes were usually cylindrical pipes, either drain pipes or preferably the cylinders from a cart axle, filled with gelignite or HME and electrically initiated. The IRA of the time were ambushing British troops on the roads and certainly learned the trick of laying multiple roadside IEDs at the same spacing as convoy vehicles. I can find little record of timed IEDs of the time, but the later 1939 “S-Plan” campaign in Great Britain concentrated on the use of timed IEDs. The cylinders were closed by two end plates – initially with a bolt running down the central axis, and later by a bolt that fitted to the outside of the cylinder. Command wire initiated devices of this type were occasionally adapted to be come booby traps by the use of a grenade striker system. The diagram below, drawn by an IRA man shows one such IED.
Further research into the improvised IRA mortar described in my earlier post has thrown up more interesting facts. The background to the IRA requirement was that their roadside campaign was increasingly forcing the police and military to confine themselves to barracks (today we might call them “FOBs”), and the IRA leadership felt they needed a means to attack these barracks directly. A number of IRA members had fought in the British Army in WW1 and had experienced trench mortars, either as a user or recipient. The IRA funded a secret delegation to visit Germany and buy arms on the black market , including a German trench mortar but this mission was unsuccessful. As a fall-back they asked their engineers to develop a home made mortar based on the British “Stokes” trench mortar. I’m not sure how closely they followed the design, but the IRA version appears to have been of same calibre as the Mk 1 Stokes mortar (3 inch) and projected an 11lb mortar bomb, again the same as a Mk 1 Stokes mortar. It appears that the IRA was able to obtain British Army manual for the Stokes mortar. the tube was made by Matt Furlong’s brother, Joe, at a railway workshop, and Matt (who later died testing a version of the mortar) made the bombs for it at 198 Parnell St.
Additional research leads me to believe that the additional safety feature in the mortar fuze that Matt Furlong removed before his accident was remarkably similar to a fuze safety feature I saw in 1990 or 1991 – on another IRA mortar. That’s seventy years apart, and essentially the same safety feature being used on an improvised mortar.
Earlier bogs have reported the use of Irish revolutionary improvised munitions as far back as 1803. Use of IRA improvised weapons has been a theme for hundreds of years. I have found a long and detailed statement by an IRA weapons engineer called Patrick McHugh, given in 1952 which sheds some remarkable insight into IRA improvised weapon production between 1919 and 1922. It is generally thought that IRA imporvised mortar development started in 1970, but this shows that that date is out by about 50 years.
In 1919 the Irish volunteers established an “underground” muntions factory at 198 Parnell St in Dublin, under Michael Lynch, disguised in the cellar of a cycle business called “Heron and Lawless”. The facility was equipped with a furnace and a mould trough for casting grenade casings, a forge and a lathe. An electric light was controlled by a switch to the shop above and used to warn of danger. In such an emergency grenade casing and parts could be hidden in the forge bellows.
All moulding and casting of grenades and “shells” was done in small moulding boxes, each box containing eight shells. Both brass and iron were cast – brass for the fuze fittings. Then subsequent machining of the cast components was also undertaken at the premises. The output was about 100 improvised grenades a week, and the cost was established as 9 shillings per grenade.
The grenades , empty, were taken to a room in a house in Dominick St were they were filled with gelignite explosive and fuzed. The grenade was small and described as the size of a duck egg. This is a description of the fuze mechanism, verbatim from McHugh:
It is a little difficult to interpret without a diagram. My assessment is that a safety pin held a spring striker. The striker struck a centre fired bullet case, with bullet and propellant removed and a short length of delay fuse inserted, and the other end having a detonator crimped on.
The detonators were commercial and obtained from quarries. The time delay was nominally set for 4 seconds. Amusingly the lathe used had originally belonged to a jewellers, “Ganter’s”. When WW1 started the lathe was requisitioned by the British government and used in manufacturing shells for the British war effort. Mr Ganter than made a a formal application for it to be returned. When he got it back he sold it to the IRA for the same purpose. Other tools were obtained from the Broadstone works of the Midland railway. The springs for the grenade fuzes were obtained by a front business importing long springs from overseas and cutting them down to size. Strikers were iron rivets with the head turned down in a lathe to a sharp point. As an aside I have on my desk in front of me another IRA striker from a fuze mechanism and it’s a much cruder design from 1991. The facility was raided twice by the British but on both occasions they found nothing.
Michael Lynch then designed an improvised mortar in 1920. The propellant charge was a 12 bore shotgun cartridge with shot removed and more propellant (black powder) added. The impact fuze was adapted from the grenade fuze, but without the delay. The mortar bomb weighed 11lbs.
The IRA under Matt Furlong conducted some extensive trials of this improvised mortar system in October 1920 in County Meath. First a number of dummy mortar bombs with propellant only were fired, to establish ranges and calculate the propellant charge needed for a range of 100 yards. Then three bombs were fired without a main charge but with an impact fuze fitted to test initiation. The trials established that the bomb tumbled through the air, but despite that, the fuze appeared to work however it struck the ground. One of the engineers believed that the impact fuze was being initiated on “set back” within the mortar tube and not on impact at the target. Attempts to fire a live mortar failed as the bomb got stuck in the tube. Probably fortunately.
The engineers involved were concerned about the impact fuze functioning on “set back” within the mortar tube, so they added an additional safety mechanism (which I won’t describe here) and this was was built in to the fuze for subsequent trials. The second set of trials took place near Kells in County Meath. After firing a live shell with the new safety feature which then failed to function on impact, an argument ensued between Furlong and McHugh. Matt Furlong insisted on removing the additional safety feature and firing the mortar as originally designed. McHugh, nervous, stepped a few yards away. The others retreated. As the mortar bomb was launched it did indeed explode in the tube, severely injuring Matt Furlong, who later died in hospital.
The loss of the mortar was seen as a significant blow to the IRA in Dublin who had expected to be able to mortar British positions and barracks with impunity mounting the mortar on the back of a vehicle, a tactic that they applied successfully 60 years later in the North.
198 Parnell St in Dublin then upped its production of grenades and became a significant munitions store – because it was no longer possible to conceal the product, a steel plate was fitted behind the shop counter and a pistol and grenades kept at the counter itself. In the end the British came across the munition factory and store by accident when no-one was there.
British Forces outside the bicycle shop after the raid.
Other grenade production facilities were established in 1921, with a production capacity of 1000 per week. Later production facilities became even more industrial with revised casting technology improving manufacture. Security too, improved. Every production facility was emptied as work finished so any raids would be inconclusive. Finished munitions were kept in hides, and there was a full time organisation to move them around the city. Faked books to disguise legitimate production runs of legal products were generated, and secret dumps of reserve material were established. McHugh claimed to have personal knowledge of still extant dumps from that time even in 1952 “just in case”.
In 1922 work began on a new IRA mortar, this time based on an oxygen gas cylinder (I kid you not!). The cylinder was used for a barrel, and the mortar bombs were cast iron, pear shaped with 4 fins. The launch tripod was fitted with a quadrant and pendulum to set the angle. The propellant was a shotgun cartridge, again with an augmenting charge of blackpowder. (In 1997 I was still encountering improvised mortars using a blackpowder charge). Trials were undertaken in late 1922 outside Buttevant Barracks. The mortar bombs launched, tumbling as they reached full height then fell nose first. The mortar was used by the IRA in an action against Free State forces in Kilmallock and again at Macroom.
Recently I had a dialogue with some colleagues as I researched modern versions of this very early piece of EOD equipment from 1573.
A remarkably similar piece of equipment was in operational use only 45 years ago and I was seeking a photo of the equipment in use in the 1960’s/1970s. I’m still digging on that.
Anyway the dialogue with a few modest practitioners of the art of EOD in the 1970s took me in an interesting direction, and I’ve turned up some interesting stuff from much earlier on the subject of ROVs. The general perception of the world we live in is that the tracked ROV as used in EOD is a very modern invention. Manufacturers produce glitzy videos showing these twin-tracked vehicles performing tricks as the operator remains a safe distance behind, secure from the hazards that their robotic buddy faces. All very High-Tech. I used to work for one such manufacturer, and we have all seen the videos showing the technological prowess of a wide range of differing modern ROVs. Like many, I assumed that the tracked ROV was essentially invented for the purpose of EOD in the dark days of the early 1970s. But it appears that ROVs were around for a considerable time before the 1970s. This does not to lessen in any way the significant innovative effort that went into the development of the “wheelbarrow” series of ROVs and all subsequent EOD “robotics”, but there are some fascinating precedents.
I began by searching for images of the first ROVs in Northern Ireland in about 1972, in the hope that they might also show images of the protective screen I was looking for so I could do a visual comparison. Suddenly I came across a picture in some archives that made me sit up. You should understand that my operational experience was largely in the 1990s so I’m most familiar with Mk8 “wheelbarrow” ROV. But I came across the image which at first glance appeared to show a number of Mk 8 Chassis…. but from WW2… How could that be?
British soldiers with captured Goliaths
US Navy examine captured Goliaths on Utah Beach 11 June 1944
For comparison here’s a picture of a Mk 8 wheelbarrow – note that the main body of the Mk 8 is remarkably similar to the images above in terms of shape and scale.
The WW2 item turns out to be of a system called Goliath. It’s not an EOD ROV, but rather its a remotely controlled demolition vehicle.
When you think that probably there were only a couple of hundred Mk 8 wheelbarrows produced in the 1980s and 1990s, but there were many thousand “Goliath” ROVs produced. The Goliath ROVs were initially electrically powered but later used a small two cylinder engine. Here’s a great shot from the top, showing the engine and the wire spooling from the rear.
I also found reference to a Japanese tracked ROV, also used a a remote demolition tool – called the “I-GO” developed in 1937. How strange that the nomenclature predates the “I-Robot”
Japanese I-GO ROV from 1937
Now in the early 1990s some of the Northern Ireland EOD units developed a deployment technique called the “Rapid Deployment Trolley”. This was a cobbled together wheeled trolley on which we placed the Mk 8 wheelbarrow ROV to transport it rapidly to and from a small helicopter in emergency situations where a full deployment requiring a large helicopter wasn’t possible. So it was with delight I saw that Germans in WW2 also had such a “trolley” for the Goliath – and actually theirs looked much better engineered!. Vorsprung Durch Technic.
Wheeled Trolley for moving Goliath ROVs
A Goliath being moved on its wheeled Trolley, Warsaw
Then as I was researching the provenance of the German Goliath I came across reference to the genesis of this equipment… It turns out that the German Goliath was based on an ROV developed by the French in the years running up to WW2…. Supposedly, as the Germans advanced on Paris the inventor, Adolphe Kegresse threw the prototype into the Seine, but somehow the Nazis got wind of this, reverse-engineered it, and ended up building the Goliath. I have also found reference to the Germans recovering , later, Kegresse’s blueprints for the ROV and reverse engineering their ROV from that.
The French Kegresse ROV, 1940
I then found details of British tracked ROV, developed in 1940 by Metropolitan Vickers, again as a remote demolition tool. Here’s an image – note the interesting inwardly facing track extensions.
Vickers MLM ROV, 1940
50 of these Vickers MLMs were built before the project was suspended in 1944. I have a copy of a Canadian officer’s trial report if anyone is interested. The ROV had a range of 1100 yards and could carry 120lbs of Ammonal. Initiation was either by a command signal or a contact switch (which had a command safety override).
I then found a reference to an American ROV from WW1. This is the Wickersham Land Torpedo, built in 1918, possibly 1917 but patented in 1922. Here’s the link to the patent. They were manufactured by the Caterpillar company, I think.
Wickerhsam Land Torpedo
This ROV looks similar in size shape and design to a modern day Talon EOD ROV, or a Dragon Runner. The Wickersham and the Kegresse ROVs look pretty similar.
I kept digging and encountered 2 more tracked ROvs that predates the American one – both French.
The first of these was the “torpille terrestre electrique” (electrical land torpedo), developed by M. Gabet and M. Aubriot in 1915. It could carry 200kgs of explosive and was wire guided of course. I’m intrigued that the single lever track at the rear looks a little like the lever track on some modern robots.
The second of these was the “Schnieder Crocodile” also developed in 1915 and trialled by many Allied nations, including the British, Belgian, Italian and Russians.
“Crocodiles” Schneider type B.
It could carry 40kg of explosives and looks similar in size, shape and scale to the Allen-Vanguard ROV
So it seems that next year will be the centenary of the tracked ROV…
Update on Friday, January 2, 2015 at 1:45PM by Roger Davies
Here’s a video showing that the Gemeran Goliath ROV was also radio controlled, and not just command wire steered.
For some time now I have been digging slowly and methodically for details of late 19th century techniques for dealing with IEDs, mainly focused on the activities of the London based Colonel Vivian Majendie. As the Chief Inspector of Explosives he had a broad ranging role, including legislation regarding the industrial production and storage of explosives. But Majendie was also responsible for the response to anarchist and Fenian revolutionary IEDs which were remarkably prevalent at the time. Remember that the 1890s, for instance, were referred to as “the decade of the bomb” because of the prevalence of explosive devices.
I have mentioned in previous blogs that Majendie constructed a “secret” facility for rendering safe IEDs. His work there was assisted by Dr August Dupre – a German emigre and highly experienced chemist. This facility was surprisingly just a couple of hundred yards from Downing Street on Duck Island at the bottom end of the lake in St James’s Park, opposite Horseguards.
There is a story that the bomb defusing facility still existed in mothballs in the 1970s. To preserve it, the wooden building and its contents were recovered by the Royal Engineers to Chatham in Kent. The story goes that some RE quartermaster in the 1980s felt it was messing up his stores so it was destroyed and scrapped. Sigh. In such a way is Ozymandias sometimes forgotten.
So for a couple of decades I’ve been interested in what equipment existed there – but Majendie’s OPSEC was pretty good. I think I know where some official files may be that detail it but time has precluded a visit to those archives yet.
But yesterday I turned up a new lead. Firstly I found a document that detailed some of Majendie’s thoughts on EOD operations. He discussed moving suspect devices in wicker hand carts to one of three locations strategically placed around London. One on Duck Island – close to the heart of government in Whitehall and sufficiently remote in its immediate environment. One in the “ditch” surrounding the Tower of London, for IEDs found in the financial centre of London, and one in a cutting or quarry in Hyde Park for devices in the commercial district. It appears that Majendie won approval for the construction of at least two of these (Hyde Park and Duck Island) and that the Duck Island facility was completed first. But not much of a clue as to what it contained, other than some sort of mechanical contrivance for dealing with the infernal machines. So a bit more digging ensued. Now, I know from other research that Majendie conducted close relations with both the United States and with France. Anarchist IEDs were almost endemic in France at the time. Majendie makes some remark in the 1880s that he has “adapted the French techniques” and refers to their approach as often blowing the devices up in place – whereas Majendie prefers to move them to his secret facilities to deal with them there.
But then I find an associated reference that suggests that Majendie used equipment of the same kind for defusing bombs that the French used at the Municipal Laboratory in Paris. A clue, then, and a new avenue.
So, I’ve had some success.
This is a summary of what I have found. The French authorities established a Municipal Laboratory for dealing with IEDs in some open ground near Porte de Vincennes in Paris and others at 3 other locations elsewhere in the City. The facility consisted of some earth banks and a series of wooden huts. I think the facility was set up in the 1880s and certainly was still in existence in 1910. This is an image from 1910.
Within this facility was a range of equipment including x-ray equipment (after it was invented) and a very robust piece of machinery called a “Morane Press”. I think this is that key piece of equipment and I have a hunch (nothing more) that Majendie’s facility on Duck Island was somewhat similar in terms of construction, and Majendie too may have used a Morane press. This is a picture of the “Morane press” taken at he the Paris facility, again somewhat later but the press was still in use in 1910.
I then found a beautiful report from 1906 describing the operational routine of the Paris police at the time. The report describes that the occurrence of suspect IEDs in Paris in 1906 was “not at all an infrequent occurrence”. Some elements of the report:
A “bomb squad’ was based at the laboratory and connected by a telephone to central police headquarters. The headquarters tasked the unit to respond to a suspect IED. The response is described as being similar to a “fire call”.
The lead EOD tech has a fast response vehicle, described as a 16 horsepower “racing bodied” automobile. it is followed by an “automobile bomb van”.
Six chemists are assigned to the unit, and one always deploys as the lead operator. They work one week shifts, and five weeks off to “recover from nerves”
The lead chemist brings the “bomb van” close to the device, and the operator after inspecting it, lifts it carefully , maintaining its positional attitude and places it in a containment box. Perhaps their procedures had evolved from the 1880s “blow in place” policy.
The photograph below may show the response vehicle and a containment vessel. I can’t be sure because I think the photo was mislabelled as “Paris police headquarters, 1920s” but I found the photo amongst other photos of the explosive laboratory and to my untrained eye the vehicle looks like a 1906 car not a 1920s car. I think the black object on the floor might be a containment vessel. The operators are certainly steely-eyed.
The report describes how many IEDs of the time were sensitive to movement which changed its orientation – the initiation mechanism was two liquids which, if the device was tilted, mixed and caused a detonation.
The bomb van is described a “heavy (voiture lourde) double phaeton 12 hp automobile, refitted from the regular tourist trade, with a pneumatic spring device for gentle running and 120mm tires”
The “bomb box” or containment vessel is placed over the rear springs, opening by a letdown from behind. It is fitted with shredded wood fibre and into this is placed the IED.
The IED is then moved accordingly to the facility in Porte de Vincennes or one of three other such facilities strategically placed around the City ( note the similarity to Majendie’s plan) . The concept is to move the device very quickly in case it is time-initiated.
Once at the facility the device is immediately x-rayed after being placed behind an armoured screen. As noted in earlier posts, the French deployed x-ray equipment for security operations within months of the invention in 1896.
At this stage, depending on the x-ray, the device may be manually rendered safe. The report mentions a specific IED were the hands of the timing clock could be seen to be stationary from analysis of the radiograph, allowing a manual procedure to make the device safe.
The report then describes the “hydraulic press”. It is tucked in behind earthen mounds. Here’s a picture of what I think is the pump that powered the Morane press.
And here are the earthen mounds surrounding the facility
The press is used to dismantle IEDs, and if a detonation is caused, the effects are contained. The press is robust enough to survive. Quite often there are detonations several times a week. The effectiveness of the press is described as 75% – three times out of four a device does not explode but the components are recovered for forensic examination. That’s not a bad strike rate at all, given the sensitive explosives used and the initiation types.
The report also stresses how many of the IEDs are not publicly reported in order to keep the public calm
In summary then I think that the Paris facilities are a remarkable reminder that IEDs are not new, and surges in IED use have been seen before. The facility seems to have been in use for about thirty years, and despite the different techniques of today’s bomb squads, their technology was surprisingly effective. We can’t be certain that Majendie was using the same strategy and same technology in London in the 1890s but I think there is a high degree of likelihood he was. Like today, there was a willingness to share EOD technology, and technical intelligence, between different national agencies. The Paris police clearly had a sophisticated and well resourced EOD unit operating across their city, with a thought-through strategy focused on:
reducing damage to property
returning the situation to normality as soon as possible
technical intelligence and forensically-focused render-safe procedures.
Roger Davies
